[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance"
- From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- To: Joshua Allen <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ken North <email@example.com>,firstname.lastname@example.org, sateesh narahari <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:52:10 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Allen [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:58 PM
> To: Ken North; email@example.com; sateesh narahari
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards
> It is really hard to imagine any logic behind the recent
> move, other than "ooops!"
I don't really want to continue flogging this dead horse, but I just
saw Opera's press release on this episode:
"The irony of Microsoft's claim to standards-support is complete when you
check the MSN.com site for compliance with the XHTML standard. Anyone can go
to the W3C's standards validation service at http://validator.w3.org/ and
type in www.msn.com. The document returned demonstrates clearly that not a
single document on their site adheres to W3C specifications, and many of
their documents do not use XHTML at all, e.g. http://careers.msn.com/."