[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance"
- From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:38:30 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John.Brooking@NA.SAPPI.COM [mailto:John.Brooking@NA.SAPPI.COM]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:28 PM
> To: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
> email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards
> comp liance"
> Double irony: I blindly went out to Mike's link with my IE
> 5.5 browser (my company's standard), and of course my "user experience" of
> the Opera page was far "less than optimal" with IE.
It looks terrible in IE 6 too. Just in case others are mentally decrepit
like me and missed the point at first reading, the Opera page validates
perfectly as legal XHTML: "Congratulations, this document validates as XHTML
1.0 Transitional! " sayeth http://validator.w3.org/
<plug> I've used Opera as my default browser for several months now ...
gotta send them the $35 one of these days ... other than sites that
deliberately force one to use IE, I've had extremely few problems</plug>