[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Java: interface methods with same name and signatur e
- From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
- To: 'Ronald Bourret' <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>, xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:56:23 -0700
You just provide one implementation. There is no way to have 2 different
implementations for a method with the same name and signature, even if you
implement 2 different interfaces that declare that method.
In the few cases where this has been an obstacle for me, I just created
adapters and factory methods on the object to provide an appropriate adapter
rather than implementing the interfaces directly.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@rpbourret.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: xml-dev
> Subject: [xml-dev] Java: interface methods with same name and
> signature
>
>
> Sorry about the non-XML topic...
>
> Suppose I have two interfaces, both of which have a method
> with the same
> name and the same signature. For example:
>
> public interface foo1 {public void foo()}
> public interface foo2 {public void foo()}
>
> Now suppose I want a single object to implement both interfaces:
>
> public class fooimp implements foo1, foo2
>
> Calling methods shouldn't be a problem, as I can cast:
>
> fooimp fi = new fooimp();
> (foo1)fi.foo();
> (foo2)fi.foo();
>
> But what is the syntax for actually implementing the methods? This is
> clearly a problem:
>
> public class fooimp implements foo1, foo2
> {
> public void foo() {...} // from foo1
> public void foo() {...} // from foo2
> }
>
> I couldn't find anything in the Java spec...
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Ron