[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Managing XML dialects - any good processes?
- From: "Christopher R. Maden" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 02:47:17 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 16:18 26-10-2001, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>2) Using DTDs. A tossup. Yes, schema implementations are newer than DTD
>implementations, but schemas provide a number of advantages, most
>prominently data types. The idea of starting with DTDs and moving to
>schemas is probably a good one, especially if people are new to XML,
>since DTDs are much simpler to learn.
I've actually begun using XSDL even in contexts where no schema processing
is ever going to happen - for documentation. I have XSLT that generates
HTML documentation *and* DTDs from the schemas, which makes things a bit
My XSLT doesn't currently handle all of XSDL; I've only implemented the
parts I need, and other than a few simple data types, I haven't used parts
of XSDL that go beyond DTD functionality (with this system, anyway). But
it's certainly been useful.
The idea came from a literate schema approach that Alex Milowski was using
at Lexica, hacking documentation into a pre-xs:annotation version of XSDL.
Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, HMM Consulting Int'l, Inc.
DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
<URL: http://www.hmmci.com/ > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----