Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Daniel Veillard scripsit:

>   I would be tempted to say that xml:id being an ID, it's an
> ID duplicate and hence the document is invalid. No such document
> should exist at the moment since xml: is reserved ...

I agree except for the word "invalid"; it should be merely
xml:id-unconforming.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan