[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:15:52 -0500 (EST)
Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:
> Again, why would xml:id be architecturally superior? Without
> answers to that question, there is no reason to continue this
> thread because the requirement has not been clearly articulated.
To provide an interoperable meaning for nude-name XPointers that
does not depend on any particular vocabulary, format, or
schema.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan