[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ID-ness is not the same as type (Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-nessin XML)
- From: email@example.com (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: bob mcwhirter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 09:58:45 +0000
Bob's comments remind me of one of the good things about the XML
Schema key/keyref mechanism -- it separates 'being a key' from 'being
a string/integer/date'. SGML and then XML conflated these two, which
was with hindsight a mistake.
It would be nice if whatever solution we come up with didn't make that
mistake again. I _think_ the xml:idatt(s) proposal at least could be
understood to be _additional_ information about an attribute.
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: email@example.com