Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Michael Fuller <msf@mds.rmit.edu.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Ajay K sanghi <sanghi@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Registration status
  • From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@elcel.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Understanding the ID
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@elcel.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?
  • From: Eric Lemond <elemond@neocore.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@hotmail.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• ID-ness is not the same as type (Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-nessin XML)
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• [xml-dev] Java, DTD locally
  • From: Randall Britten <randall@sevenc.co.za>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: ID-ness is not the same as type (Re: [xml-dev] Re: determinin gID-ness in XML)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Java, DTD locally
  • From: "Robert C. Lyons" <boblyons@unidex.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• [xml-dev] First "XML Cup" to be awarded at the XML Conference andExpositio n 2001
  • From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@idealliance.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Java, DTD locally
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• [xml-dev] fyi - XSL Formatting Object Composer, XM,and XMI technologies and articles
  • From: Jeffrey I Condon <jicondon@us.ibm.com>
• [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: dom4j 1.1 released
  • From: James Strachan <james_strachan@yahoo.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• [xml-dev] Final week for speaker proposals for NEXTWARE Spring 2002
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• [xml-dev] [horribly off topic] Rob't Burns on the DOJ sellout
  • From: Mark Verdegliebe <merkweurdigeliebe@email.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Java, DTD locally
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>
• [xml-dev] ANN: XSLT/XPath and XSLFO Training Nov. 26-28,29-30 inWashington D.C.
  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@defined.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: xml-dj <xml-dj@gmx.de>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Nikita Ogievetsky <nogievet@cogx.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• [xml-dev] HTML Include in XSL document
  • From: "Magick, Brian" <Brian.Magick@COMPAQ.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] HTML Include in XSL document
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] HTML Include in XSL document
  • From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] HTML Include in XSL document
  • From: Jonathan Perret <jperret@noos.fr>
• Re: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• [xml-dev] Ya Just Can't Trust the Public to Stay Bought
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• [xml-dev] Common Sense approach to ID and IDness
  • From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Common Sense approach to ID and IDness
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Common Sense approach to ID and IDness
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: xml-dj <xml-dj@gmx.de>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] normalizing schemas
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• [xml-dev] RE: Common Sense approach to ID and IDness
  • From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
• [xml-dev] [Announce] dbXML XML Database Beta 3 Available
  • From: Kimbro Staken <kstaken@dbxmlgroup.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• [xml-dev] xsl and xml and javascript. argh!!!!!!!
  • From: "Birney, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Birney@spis.police.uk>
• [xml-dev] updated xml, javascript and xsl problemo.
  • From: "Birney, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Birney@spis.police.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Birney, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Birney@spis.police.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• SV: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• SV: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• [xml-dev] fastetst, string concatenation or DOM object?
  • From: Peter Thornqvist <thornqvist_peter@hotmail.com>
• SV: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] fastetst, string concatenation or DOM object?
  • From: Jonathan Perret <jperret@noos.fr>
• [xml-dev] Notations and unparsed entities in the wild
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• IDs and databases (Was: determining ID-ness in XML)
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• RELAXNG Tools
  • From: jeff.lomas@oasis-open.org
• Re: [xml-dev] Notations and unparsed entities in the wild
  • From: "Peter S. Housel" <housel@home.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] RELAXNG Tools
  • From: "Sean P. Scanlon" <sps@bluedot.net>
• xmetal and docbook
  • From: "monkey buns" <xmldude0909@hotmail.com>
• XML Verticals List
  • From: "Will Bradley" <wormdongle@hotmail.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] updated xml, javascript and xsl problemo.
  • From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@hotmail.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Notations and unparsed entities in the wild
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• XML to PDF
  • From: "Will Bradley" <wormdongle@hotmail.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: SV: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• fyi - Building an XML-based message server
  • From: "Jeffrey I Condon" <jicondon@us.ibm.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Ajay K sanghi" <sanghi@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
•  re: IDs and databases (Was: determining ID-ness in XML)
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• [OT] Missing posts
  • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] XML to PDF
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] XML to PDF
  • From: "Enzo Maggi" <enzo.maggi@expway.tv>
• RE: [xml-dev] XML to PDF
  • From: "Daniel Lanovaz" <daniel@tendara.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
• DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Missing posts
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev]  re: IDs and databases (Was: determining ID-ness in XML)
  • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
• Bounded attributes
  • From: "Caro, Samuel" <Samuel.Caro@USAHQ.UnitedSpaceAlliance.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Missing posts
  • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: [xml-dev]  re: IDs and databases (Was: determining ID-ness in XML)
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] XML to PDF
  • From: JOHN CANT /6183 <jcant@OmniCell.com>
• RE: SV: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Al Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: david.hunter@mobileq.com
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Missing posts
  • From: "Winkowski, Daniel" <winkowski@mitre.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@nihongo.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Missing posts
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Hanson, Jon" <jhanson@lehman.COM>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@rbii.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] re: IDs and databases (Was: determining ID-ness in XML)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev]  re: IDs and databases (Was: determining ID-ness in XML)
  • From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Caught napping!
  • From: Linda Grimaldi <lgrimaldi@neocore.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Missing posts
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Mike_Leditschke@nemmco.com.au
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution --
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
• SV: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution --
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Michel Rodriguez <mrodrigu@mirlin.xmltwig.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution --
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@ihug.com.au>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Seaborne, Mark" <Mark_Seaborne@stercomm.com>
• <!DOCTYPE> removed by DOMParser?
  • From: mccabe_julie_f@jpmorgan.com
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@oracle.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution--
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution--
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] <!DOCTYPE> removed by DOMParser?
  • From: Elena Litani <elitani@ca.ibm.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• [ZVON]: MathML testsuite in Example repository
  • From: Jiri Jirat <Jiri.Jirat@systinet.com>
• Penguins! (was RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility)
  • From: John.Brooking@NA.SAPPI.COM
• Re: [xml-dev] [ZVON]: MathML testsuite in Example repository
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] <!DOCTYPE> removed by DOMParser?
  • From: mccabe_julie_f@jpmorgan.com
• Discover EPI Internet Direct!
  • From: "EPI" <promotions@epidirect.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Al B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
• Re: SV: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• Software Pioneer James Clark among Keynote Speakers at XML 2001 Conference and Exposition
  • From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@idealliance.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen" <f0p@post.dk>
• Semantic web?
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen" <f0p@post.dk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• C++ to XML Schema / DTD
  • From: smarks@digisolutions.com
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Linda Grimaldi <lgrimaldi@neocore.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Subrahmanyam Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Soumitra Sengupta <soumitra@b-bop.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Tom Bradford <bradford@dbxmlgroup.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Linda Grimaldi <lgrimaldi@neocore.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Linda Grimaldi <lgrimaldi@neocore.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• XML-DEV Mailing List (RE:Missing Posts, etc.)
  • From: Jeffrey Lomas <jeff.lomas@oasis-open.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@ihug.com.au>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution--
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practice: managing dialect evolution --
  • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
• SV: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] Semantic web?
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• To do list relative to W3C XML Schema
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• SV: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• Encoding/Character problem
  • From: "SHARPE, Ian" <Ian.SHARPE@cambridge.sema.slb.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Encoding/Character problem
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Control characters in node value
  • From: Deepali Mendhekar <deepalim@pspl.co.in>
• How to create an attribute node
  • From: Deepali Mendhekar <deepalim@pspl.co.in>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Control characters in node value
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Bill de hOra" <bdehora@interx.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Bill de hOra" <bdehora@interx.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Peter J. Gale" <thesemanticweb@yahoo.co.uk>
• xml declaration in DTDs and encodings
  • From: oliver sick <o.sick@gikom-cse.de>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] xml declaration in DTDs and encodings
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] xml declaration in DTDs and encodings
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• ANN: xlinkit 4.3 released
  • From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• XML and "Who's on first?"
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Oracle XSU get_xml import function
  • From: "SHARPE, Ian" <Ian.SHARPE@cambridge.sema.slb.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Peter J. Gale" <thesemanticweb@yahoo.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Control characters in node value
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• List-Unsubscribe
  • From: "John C Dumay" <jcd@progressivemanagement.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Al Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Kent's "Data and Reality"
  • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Control characters in node value
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] 'The scary truth about Relational Model' links ( was :Caught napping! )
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• =?windows-1251?Q?=CF=F0=E8=E3=EB=E0=F8=E5=ED=E8=E5?=
  • From: "=?windows-1251?Q?=CC=E5=E6=E4=F3=ED=E0=F0=EE=E4=ED=FB=E9_=D4=EE=F0=F3=EC?=" <forummm_@rbcmail.ru>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xlinkit 4.3 released
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Walter Underwood's robots
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] To do list relative to W3C XML Schema
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
• ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• AW: [xml-dev] Browser-based XML Editor?
  • From: "Christian Stillhard" <christian@stillhard.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Peter J. Gale" <thesemanticweb@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xlinkit 4.3 released
  • From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] Browser-based XML Editor?
  • From: "Steven Noels" <stevenn@outerthought.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Justin Couch <justin@vlc.com.au>
• I need a research position to continue my project
  • From: Li Bing <bing.li@asu.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] To do list relative to W3C XML Schema
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• SV: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• XML ID - Why is it needed ?
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• What constitutes an XML document?
  • From: "Paul Jupp" <jupppaul@hotmail.com>
• demo request
  • From: Melissa at SleuthPlanet <melissarobins@sleuthplanet.com>
• SV: [xml-dev] What constitutes an XML document?
  • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
• Re: [xml-dev] What constitutes an XML document?
  • From: Marc-Olivier Bernard <Marc-Olivier.Bernard@polytechnique.fr>
• Regarding XML support for Netscape
  • From: syed Ilias mirza <mirza@dwp.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>
• The XMLReader Interface, Chapter 7 of Processing XML with Java
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Updating XML
  • From: benp@marketing.net.uk
• OASIS UBL TC FORMS SUBCOMMITTEES
  • From: "Carol Geyer" <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: Lars Martin <Lars.Martin@smb-tec.com>
• lists.xml.org archives not accessible; any alternatives?
  • From: Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] lists.xml.org archives not accessible; any alternatives?
  • From: Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>
• Version 1.4 of XSV released: derivation-by-restriction experiment
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Version 1.4 of XSV released: derivation-by-restriction experiment
  • From: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Version 1.4 of XSV released: derivation-by-restriction experiment
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: [xml-dev] The XMLReader Interface, Chapter 7 of Processing XML with Java
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Applications of IDness: Get it from the storage system (Was RE: [xml-dev] The XMLReader Interface, Chapter 7 of Processing XM L with Java)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• SAX Parsing of an XML file
  • From: "Paul Johnston" <pjohnston@pjnetsolutions.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Dynamic XML/XSL
  • From: "Chen, Gin" <Gin_Chen@tvratings.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic XML/XSL
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic XML/XSL
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• human-readability
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] SAX Parsing of an XML file
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Seaborne, Mark" <Mark_Seaborne@stercomm.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• [ANN] Online HTML to XML Conversion Service
  • From: "html2xml.com" <contact@html2xml.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• annotations outside validation
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might bebetterthanIDs...
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Doing less is all a matter of perspective was Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• XMLDecl version
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] Online HTML to XML Conversion Service
  • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• magic competition (was Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation)
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Implementations not specifications are the problem was Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Doing less is all a matter of perspective was Re:[xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] magic competition (was Re: [xml-dev] annotationsoutside validation)
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: Implementations not specifications are the problem was Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Doing less is all a matter of perspective was Re:[xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: "Jeremy Allen" <jallen@elliptiq.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "J C Theriot" <theriot@posc.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] XMLDecl version
  • From: "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org>
• RE: [xml-dev] Implementations not specifications are the problem was Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] XMLDecl version
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Implementations not specifications are the problem was Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Opera XML hypertexxt
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Opera XML hypertexxt
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• [xml-dev] Help needed with validating XML with the Schema it's suppose to abide by
  • From: "Chris Hill" <Chris.Hill@Ivara.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] magic competition (was Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation)
  • From: Kal Ahmed <kal@techquila.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Opera XML hypertexxt
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: [xml-dev] Help needed with validating XML with the Schema it's suppose to abide by
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Doing less is all a matter of perspective was Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• [Announce] XML:DB XML Database API Reference Implementation
  • From: Kimbro Staken <kstaken@dbxmlgroup.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Doing less is all a matter of perspective was Re:[xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: Jim Wissner <jim@jbrix.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] XMLDecl version
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xyzfind.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might bebetterthanIDs...
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• New XML Toolkit for z/OS and OS/390: V1R3
  • From: "Jeffrey I Condon" <jicondon@us.ibm.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@nihongo.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• namespaces and types
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@nihongo.org>
• Re: Implementations not specifications are the problem was Re:[xml-dev] IDs considered harmful
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation
  • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
  • From: <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• W3C XML Schema is more than "close by default) (Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation)
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Online HTML to XML Conversion Service
  • From: "html2xml.com" <contact@html2xml.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema is more than "close by default) (Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation)
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Derived DTD - overriding attributes
  • From: Kevin Burges <xmldude@burieddreams.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Caught napping!
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• How to avoid the sequens of child elements in DTD, yet keep the cardinality?
  • From: Albena Georgieva <albena@info.nl>
• Namespaces Talk
  • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• SWISSPROT DTD
  • From: Leela Krishna Poola <krishna@dsl.serc.iisc.ernet.in>
• RE: [xml-dev] DOM or SAX: Sense and Sensibility
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@nihongo.org>
• Contents of a tag
  • From: ikke@dreamer.co.uk
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@nihongo.org>
• xml:dtatts for DTDless XML was Re: Implementations not specifications are the problem
  • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema is more than "close by default) (Re: [xml-dev] annotations outside validation)
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: Robin LaFontaine <robin@monsell.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: Tom Bradford <bradford@dbxmlgroup.com>
• New release of XML Schema Test Collection
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: [xml-dev] Contents of a tag
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Interoperability
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] How to avoid the sequens of child elements in DTD, yet keep the cardinality?
  • From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@av.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
• RE: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: "Chen, Gin" <Gin_Chen@tvratings.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Contents of a tag
  • From: "Chen, Gin" <Gin_Chen@tvratings.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@av.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: mrossi@csc.com
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@av.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Regarding XML support for Netscape
  • From: heikki@netscape.com (Heikki Toivonen)
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• RE: [xml-dev] Updating XML
  • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: PaulT <pault12@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Using '--' in comments
  • From: "Cliff Martin" <cmartin@cox.rr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Using '--' in comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• Need an XML parser in perl
  • From: "shravan kumar" <b_shravan@hotmail.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
  • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Need an XML parser in perl
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability [long]
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
• Parsing Streaming XML Incrementally
  • From: Development Role Account <dev@neurosphere.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability [long]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Streaming XML Incrementally
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Need an XML parser in perl
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Need an XML parser in perl
  • From: John.Brooking@NA.SAPPI.COM
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability [long]
  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
• so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
  • From: "Don Smith" <donalds@isogen.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Need an XML parser in perl
  • From: "Sterin, Ilya" <Isterin@ciber.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] so why don't more browsers support XSLT?
  • From: "Don Smith" <donalds@isogen.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability [long]
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Streaming XML Incrementally
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• RE: [xml-dev] Interoperability [long]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Regarding XML support for Netscape
  • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
• Mobile XML Databases and Synchronization
  • From: "Daniel Lanovaz" <daniel@tendara.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Streaming XML Incrementally
  • From: Development Role Account <dev@neurosphere.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Regarding XML support for Netscape
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Streaming XML Incrementally
  • From: Geert Bormans <geert.bormans@advalvas.be>
• Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Streaming XML Incrementally
  • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Regarding XML support for Netscape
  • From: heikki@netscape.com (Heikki Toivonen)
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability [long]
  • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
• re:XML-DEV Mailing List (RE:Missing Posts, etc.)
  • From: Jeffrey Lomas <jeff.lomas@oasis-open.org>