[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:56:46 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: From "(env:" "cowan)" at "Nov 12, 2001 09:47:57 pm"
Evan Lenz scripsit:
> Hmm, then what is this sentence meant to convey? "Nor does it constitute a
> minimum set of information that must be returned by an XML processor."
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#intro
It meant that we were not changing the definition of XML 1.0.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan