[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better than IDs...
John Cowan wrote:
> Evan Lenz wrote:
> > Perhaps instead of adding something like xml:id, the next
> version or errata
> > or xml-dev RDDL-like effort just needs to tighten up the
> requirements about
> > what to report from the internal subset (that would be a short spec for
> > sure).
> Been there, done that; it's the Infoset.
Hmm, then what is this sentence meant to convey? "Nor does it constitute a
minimum set of information that must be returned by an XML processor."