[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 12:00 9-11-2001, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>The whole point of xml:id is for documents which are well-formed. All valid
>XML documents are valid with respect to a DTD which can indicate IDs.
>Right, but there is no need to add xml:id to documents which are associated
>with a DTD, the entire reason for existence is those XML documents without a
>DTD. So yes, you can shoot yourself in the head, but doing so is not
OK - reality check. Am I the only one who likes to move back and forth
between the valid and well-formed worlds?
I like to have a DTD when I'm authoring but I see no need to inflict a DTD
of (for example) DocBook's scope on a browser when I deliver a file. I
would like to have my IDs remain IDs, however. I would like to provide
just an internal subset, but there's still some software that tries to
check validity when there's any DTD at all, and so an internal-subset-only
Yes, if their software could be changed to acknowledge ID PIs or xml:id, it
could be changed not to screw up validation, but the PI solution feels more
general and stays out of my naming area. If I could have two IDs on an
element, then xml:id wouldn't be so bad, but I can't, so it is.
Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, HMM Consulting Int'l, Inc.
DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
<URL: http://www.hmmci.com/ > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----