[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] IDs considered harmful or why keys might be better thanIDs...
David Carlisle wrote:
>>Looks like a 3rd application to add to the list (after DocBook, MathML
>>and SOAP). If the list continues to grow, the question might become why
>>these applications have decided not to use (or to use in an invalid way)
>>internal subsets or full DTDs.
>>
>
> There nothing non standard about the internal subset in Docbook or MathML
> it's just inconvenient to have an internal subset with a few hundred ID
> declarations in, and not much more convenent to arrange to just have the
> ones that are actually used in the document.
You're right, that's not what I meant, sorry.
I should have said like in my previous email that "some DocBook or
MathML users do not use it properly"!
Eric
>
> David
>
--
Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML.
http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------