[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Registration status
- To: ian.graham@utoronto.ca
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Registration status
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:38:44 GMT
- Cc: ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0111151839330.630-100000@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>(message from Ian Graham on Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:49:00 -0500 (EST))
- References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0111151839330.630-100000@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
> Any thoughts?
sounds reasonable to me, although I vaguely remember some previous
discussion as to why having separate xxx+xml types was thought
preferable to having extra information layered over the xml type.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.