[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
James Clark wrote:
[magisterial summary deleted]
> (B) The other choice we can make is to say that ID-ness is important.
I agree with this view, and on primarily data-centric grounds. Without
IDs, XML can only serialize trees. With IDs, it can serialize
arbitrary graphs in a fairly application-independent way, at least
within a single document. This is often an important facility.
> The only solution that I've seen that works with choice (B)
> is xml:idatt(s).
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <email@example.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel