[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 05:02 pm, Evan Lenz wrote:
> I believe that you're splitting hairs. Please recognize that his statement
> is true on some level--that there's a distinction to be made between IDs
> and IDREFs which are defined in XML 1.0, and other methods of reference
> which are specific to applications of XML, such as XLink.
I'm not splitting hairs here. Even ID/IDREF require an application to