Lists Home |
Date Index |
> From: Gavin Thomas Nicol [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 7:42 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [xml-dev] WebDAV (was Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1
> The spec is unclear on this, and clients certainly can't handle unordered
> multiple occurrences of the response blocks... though the spec appears to
> allow this.
We are really getting off-topic here.
If this issue is not on the current open issues list (), you should raise
it on the WebDAV WG mailing list ().
> > > WebDAV interoperability has more to do with the small size of
> the overall
> > > community (tribal knowledge) than it does with clarity or
> correctness of
> > > specification.
> > Yes and no. I agree that RFC2518 needs more work to go into the
> next stage
> > in the standardization process, but I doub't you'll find a
> single person in
> > the Working Group disagreeing with that. In fact, there's a long list of
> > known issues which need to be resolved for this next step.
> I know this... my point is that if you implement according to the
> specification, you will likely be wrong, or at least not
> interoperate. That's
> not useful.
Yes. So what's the right way to address this? (a) have interoperability
tests, (b) document the issues, (c) work on the resolution. That's what the
Working Group does.