[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi Soumitra
My 5 cents is wait for the Update. If the XQuery goes to rec. without
update, everybody will invent their own update, and a mes will prevail.
JJ
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Soumitra Sengupta [mailto:soumitra@b-bop.com]
> Sendt: 23. december 2001 17:48
> Til: Champion, Mike
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Emne: Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working
> drafts - Stil l
> missing Updates
>
>
> I remember seeing a comment by Michael Rys in this group. He said
> something like - the group ran out of bandwidth to deal with the
> UPDATE.semantics at this time and will visit it later. My
> question is
> this - Is it better to let the XQuery get to recommendation without
> UPDATE now and then deal with it later? or Is it better to delay this
> and have a more complete XQuery recommendation a few months later?
> I do not know the answer to this yet but would like to hear other
> opinions. As Mike points out, if there are enough people on
> the side of
> deciding on UPDATE now, there maybe time to deal with this.
>
> Soumitra
>
> Champion, Mike wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Anyway, I [personally, the corporate line may be different]
> agree that
> >XQuery badly needs update support sooner rather than later. I can't
> >imagine that people feel as strongly about this issue as
> they do about
> >patents, but look what happened when the rest of the world
> told the W3C that
> >the patent policy working group was going down an unacceptable path
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
|
