Lists Home |
Date Index |
John Aldridge wrote:
> At 15:57 18/01/2002 +0100, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
> >OK. Following RFC 2396, namespaces are resources because they have an
> >But resources aren't namespace. Hence, RDDL should be named NDL.
> I think this part of the debate is caused by a simple confusion... some
> people are assuming that in "Resource Directory Description Language" the
> word "resource" refers to the namespace being described. I understand the
> intention to be that it refers to the resources which might be associated
> with that namespace.
You are absolutely right. I just got confused as well on that issue. Thanks.
P.S. The real reason is that it is a good acronym nonetheless :-))