[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 15:04, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Basically this is "me too" post echoing Paul T's sentiments that created this
> subthread in the first place. I really don't think "The what is the at the end
> of a namespace riddle?" is a significant one to most people and for those whom
> it is a significant issue I don't think RDDL is the right answer to the
> question.
Try giving a presentation on Namespaces in XML to 180 people at a
conference. Or even just a presentation on one of the W3C technologies
that uses a namespace. People do seem to want something there.
It's a real question, despite the best efforts of many to deny it.
Is RDDL the right answer? I like it better than the crap opaque URNs
often tossed around. That's all right by me.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com
|
