[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Okay, Jonathan's teasing me, but I can take it. There's no such thing as a
stupid question, just stupid people (did I say that?).
Anyhow, I've now thoroughly perused the RDDL spec, and understand at least
part of it. What I'm not seeing (and maybe it's there) is how it describes
namespace URIs that are *only* an identifier? It seems to me there should be
an explicit "purpose" value in RDDL for that, but I'm not seeing it.
(BTW, I haven't read the XLink Rec, either, for those of you looking for
pies to toss...)
> Ok, so let's describe the intent of how a resource is to be
> used, let's call
> that a "purpose" and sometimes different systems will need
> different forms
> of a resource, let's call that a "nature". So if we label a
> resource, by
> "nature" and "purpose", we will have a mechanism where a
> system can pick a
> resource according to what it needs to do with it.
>
> >
> > Is that to far whacked out an idea? Perhaps my own intent
> is unclear...
> >
>
> I think it would work.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
|
