Lists Home |
Date Index |
> Mike Champion wrote:
> > The issues here aren't with XML 1.0 so much as with DOM, XSLT, SVG,
> > CSS, etc. I'm saying "just make SURE that the complex stuff those
> > wizards and GUIs generate truly interoperate," don't take the
> > vendor's word for it. "We make it easy" is the first step down the
> > road to interoperability Hell. Is that really so unfair, to MS or
> > anyone else?
> Amen Mike, I mean if you guys can't commit to a conformant implementation,
> don't let the REC out the door.
One more thought:
How many validators can validate XHTML 1.1?
MSXML bags it because it doesn't accept defaulted xmlns attributes -- and
since validation is all XML 1.0, I can't see why that should have bearing on
How many DTD/schema editors can edit the XHTML 1.1 (e.g. Modularization)
DTD? None I've found.
This is a disaster. You have a full W3C recommendation for the latest
_XHTML_ of all things -- not like its intended to be some fringe
specification, and nothing seems capable of dealing with it properly. Who is
at fault here?