xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone

RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@ingr.com>,"'Jeff Lowery'" <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:09:38 -0800
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62FA@HQ5>

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>For schemas, nyet.  But for the Schema Definition
>language itself, da.  I don't know what RELAX NG
>is using for this. Anyone?

Here is a good explanation of what RELAX NG is /not/ doing about associating
schemas with documents and why:

http://thaiopensource.com/relaxng/design.html#section:17

It is from James Clark's paper "The Design of RELAX NG."

Mike

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Taxonomies?
Next by Date: RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Taxonomies?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread