Re: [xml-dev] RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)

[Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>]

On Thursday 24 January 2002 06:10 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Or just mail java back and forth.

Blech.

> Seriously, until we review all the historical approaches,
> we keep going over the same old ground and just changing
> names on the signposts.

Right. Still, even after reviewing history, the solution isn't clear. 
My feeling is that we can do a lot for standardizing application 
deployment (hard coded semantics as it were) while avoiding the hairy 
bits.