xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again

Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again
From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:03:10 +1100
References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF6303@HQ5> <m3adv2rt0f.fsf@dmitri.coolheads.com> <007d01c1a6f2$c3410800$0301a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>

 From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
 
> I think people are indeed using XSLT as a type of AF, just not calling it
> that -- so the concept is quite useful and does live. One might question
> whether XSLT is the simplest way to represent an AF, but nonetheless an AF
> is a transform.

Or, better, a view.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

References:
- RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Graph markup
Next by Date: Web Design Principles (was Re: [xml-dev] Generality of HTTP)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread