Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis

[Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>]

On Friday 01 February 2002 12:36 pm, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > XPointer is a huge beast - a good candidate for a 2.0 spec, but
> > enormous for a 1.0 spec.  I'd be much much happier to see
> > something smaller for a first round.
>
>   Took me one week to implement the near complete support in libxml
> on top of the existing XPath implementation. 

Took me about a week to add XPointer support to XT too (really 
interesting in match patterns ;-)).

Comparatively, I would say that *XPath* is a huge beast.