Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Friday 01 February 2002 12:36 pm, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > XPointer is a huge beast - a good candidate for a 2.0 spec, but
> > enormous for a 1.0 spec. I'd be much much happier to see
> > something smaller for a first round.
> Took me one week to implement the near complete support in libxml
> on top of the existing XPath implementation.
Took me about a week to add XPointer support to XT too (really
interesting in match patterns ;-)).
Comparatively, I would say that *XPath* is a huge beast.