xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:40:17 +0000
In-reply-to: <E16ctOK-0006Bj-00@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020218110754.01ce6b78@pop3.norton.antivirus>

[John Cowan]
>By no means.  GETs are allowed to be idempotent, which means that
>the act of GETting cannot change the resource.

What if the resource is an XML representation of
"the number of times I have received a GET"?

Sean

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
  - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names R)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS