xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:51:40 -0800
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020218110754.01ce6b78@pop3.norton.antivirus> <5.1.0.14.2.20020219133846.01d73860@pop3.norton.antivirus>

Sean McGrath wrote:
> 
> [John Cowan]
> >By no means.  GETs are allowed to be idempotent, which means that
> >the act of GETting cannot change the resource.
> 
> What if the resource is an XML representation of
> "the number of times I have received a GET"?

Doctor, it hurts when I bend my arm back like this. ;)

 Paul Prescod

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
  - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
  - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread