[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Actually "worst XML tools" returns no results from Google while "best
xml tools" returns 29.
The fact that Software AG and XML Spy have paid for sponsored links when
the word "XML" and "tools" are searched for is expected and mildly
amusing when one considers that they show up in when the search terms
are worst+tool+XML. However, I don't see how it can be considered a
topic for discussion besides a mild chuckle.
--
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #110
I will not employ devious schemes that involve the hero's party getting
into
my inner sanctum before the trap is sprung.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:33 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
>
>
> Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>
> > Yes. Google probably uses most visited and most
> > linked to.
>
>
> Most linked to and most linked from.
>
> > It may also sell positions.
>
>
> It does not. It does sell keywords, so "worst xml tools"
> will get the same "Sponsored Links" (clearly so marked)
> as "best xml tools", based on the presence of "xml tools".
>
> --
> John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
> I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
|
