xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?

Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:27:36 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@microsoft.com>, John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE914@HQ5> from "Bullard, ClaudeL (Len)" at "Feb 22, 2002 04:56:20 pm"

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> It's like your Evil Overlord series:  do everything in that list 
> and you will cease to do evil. 

Not at all.  You can still do evil, just smart evil, not
stupid evil.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
        --_The Hobbit_

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security)
Next by Date: <?P[SV]I?>
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread