OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

I'm with Niels.  

This has been tried several times in several places with 
the usual reply being "so what is so special about a 
pointy bracket".  ("Don't Shock The Monkey"). It can 
be done but why do it?

There are several good object-oriented programming 
languages that support lean parsing.  Why put a 
fat parsing language into the mix with all of the 
overhead of dozens of ancillary specifications? 
It seems like a good way to confuse people and 

XML:  the pine tree of syntax-unified systems.


From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]

On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 10:22, Niels Peter Strandberg wrote:
> I want XML in Java! 

While poking around on some other projects this morning, I found:

It seems to be running the opposite direction from what Niels wants, but
it's interesting in its own way.  I'm not used to seeing "void" in

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<java version="1.0" class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">
<object class="javax.swing.JFrame">
<void property="name">


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS