[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@scenicsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM
> To: 'Nicolas LEHUEN'; 'Thomas B. Passin'; 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't
> dese rve its "X".)
>
> I was wondering out loud today about the feasibility of using
> Ant[1] to
> describe workflows. Why not? Building an application from
> components is
> conceptually no different from building anything else from
> components. It
> may not turn out to be the best approach, but it's certainly worth
> exploring.
Contrary to what many may think, I find it encouraging that I'm only a week
behind the curve:
"The syntax of the pipeline language owes a good deal to tools like make and
Ant."
http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1564
|
