xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?

Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:39:32 -0500 (EST)
Cc: John.Atchley@flightsafety.com ('Atchley John'), xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <000c01c1d03d$e8df3810$655169d5@pcukmka> from "Michael Kay" at Mar 20, 2002 06:34:45 PM

Michael Kay scripsit:

> Yes. I think Schema has definitely fallen into the trap of being too formal.

Formal != obscure.  The RELAX NG specification is quite formal, but not
at all obscure; indeed, one can for the most part skip the formal parts
and still make sense of it.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread