[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> RELAX NG does not require anything beyond what is provided by
> SAX and DOM,
> and can be cleanly layered on top of the parser. Xerces (or rather
> Xerces-J, which I assume is what you mean) supports SAX 2,
> and so works
> just fine with both Jing and MSV. There would be no advantage
> in having
> Xerces-specific RELAX NG support.
Does this means that Xerces-J (yes, I meant the Java version) can validate
an instance against a RELAX NG schema? I can't understand how this would be
possible with just support for SAX and DOM; wouldn't the parser have to
understand RELAX NG semantics?
Matt
|
