[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Rather than getting RELAX NG into Xerces-J, I see a huge point in
getting JARV[1] and the Sun MSV into JAXP. This would enable us to chose
the technology without bloating the parser. A language neutral variant
should probably be added to the DOM as well, instead of the mess (IMHO)
that is specified in Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Abstract
Schemas and Load and Save Specification [2].
[1] http://iso-relax.sourceforge.net/JARV/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-DOM-Level-3-ASLS-20020114/
/Fredrik Lindgren
Matthew Gertner wrote:
[snip]
>
> In terms of the future of RELAX NG, I also agree that there are a number of
> plausible scenarios. At worst, some of its good ideas will end up folded
> into some future version of XSD. For what it's worth, I don't see much of
> the agenda of Redmond/Redwood Shores/Armonk in the actual spec. I believe
> that if some momentum builds up behind RELAX NG, people will happily adopt
> it. This will require creating some of the additional layers that XSD
> provides (like inheritance, attribute/element defaulting, key/key ref,
> appinfo, etc.) in some clean way. It was also require some basic marketing
> efforts such as getting RELAX NG into the standard Xerces-J build, even if
> the technical justification for this isn't entirely compelling.
>
> Here's hoping...
>
> Matt
>
|
