Lists Home |
Date Index |
Adam Turoff wrote:
> If Namespaces were to be rolled into the core specification, there
> is nothing preventing a vendor from creating a parser that does
> XML without namespace support; they should just call it something
Umm, no thanks. There are still plenty of people working with DTDs and/or
avoiding the use of namespaces where possible. I don't think that it's
appropriate to condemn them to using a non-XML parser, or am I missing something?
> (like XML-lite or something, which is what XML is without
Marcus Carr email: email@example.com
Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."