Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 11:02, james anderson wrote:
> the infoset is not itself the problem. the problem begins where one
> expects or specifies that the set of "in-scope" namespaces be available
> as a static value.
> i'm curious how that came to pass.
I _think_ it's because of QNames in attribute/element values, but it may
also have to do with canonicalization discussions. I seem to remember
it being an issue for the long-ago XML Fragment discussions, but I'm not
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!