[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 13:55, Dave Winer wrote:
> Without having read most of the messages in this thread, I'd like to try to
> answer the question it raises.
>
> 1. Interop.
Thanks, but the nature of that interop has been questioned repeatedly
without much of an answer. See, for example:
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00683.html
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00697.html
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00717.html
SOAP appears to offer interop at the RPC end and flexibility at the
messaging end, but there's not much of a middle ground in between. For
those of us who think RPC has serious limits, that's not much of an
offering.
XML-RPC sounds better for the RPC-interop end, while REST sounds better
for the messaging end.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com
|
