xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )

RE: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:33:35 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3CC72C89.4080902@textuality.com>
Organization: Docuverse

> Not much new science there.  I also think that the W3C excels when it 
> formalizes what has already been proven to work. -Tim

I can't agree more, Tim.  I wish they would give up reinventing (i.e.
SOAP 1.2) and unifying (i.e. XML Schema).  I like what W3C did with
XML-Signature though.  Oops, it was a joint effort with IETF.  Never
mind.

Don

Follow-Ups:
- Job Opportunity
  - From: "Peter Pappamikail" <peter@pappamikail.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] SemWeb again
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
Next by thread: Job Opportunity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS