Lists Home |
Date Index |
I'll stop lurking and make a technical point in favor of SOAP. Yes, I
have read the e-mail threads and the referenced articles. :-) I'm one of
the program managers at Microsoft that delivered the Microsoft SOAP
My technical argument is this: all that matters when using SOAP is XML
and all the power of XML can be leveraged when building applications
that use SOAP.
I can use the same programming model for doing simple "safe" things as I
do for doing complex "unsafe" things. That programming model allows me
to leverage Schema, XSLT, XQuery, XPath, etc.
Granted, this may not be what SOAP tends to be *today*. But SOAP, at
least, enables us get there someday.
== Mike ==
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
From: Paul Prescod [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Simon St.Laurent
Cc: xml-dev; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> Did you get anyone defending SOAP on its technical merits?
Not really. There were quite a few who technically bashed it in response
to Joel's article though:
> You and Mark Baker seem to present more technical defense than any of
> the "advocates", which has me thoroughly confused.
> (Don Box did bring up a common framing format, but I'm having a
> time seeing the format mitigating the overall approach.)
Actually, if I get time I will write an article on how XML is a lousy
envelope format (whatever its other virtues!).
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription