In a message dated 10/05/02 18:07:22 GMT Daylight Time, email@example.com writes:
> The snippets of information that have emerged from WG members
> hint that
> little thought has been given to what XPath 2.0 should be,
> other than to
> serve as a handmaiden to XQuery 1.0. Is that is
> mis-characterisation of the situation?