[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Fuller [mailto:msf@mds.rmit.edu.au]
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 6:13 PM
> To: Jonathan Robie; Michael Kay; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Cc: Jeni Tennison
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should
> it include?
>
> In hindsight, keeping XPath 2.0/XSLT 2.0 clean and tight should
> have been a design goal.
>
> I suspect many of the lurking XML-DEVers (and
> XSL-LISTers, for that
> matter) are similarly in agreement with Jeni. Silence doesn't
> necessarily mean apathy: there's simply been no need to
> add anything
> to what Jeni's said, other than a "me too" such as this.
>
> (Hmmm: should I also post this to public-qt-comments?)
>
Yup.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Chances are that the gift needing returning will be the one missing the
receipt.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.
|
