Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0

["Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>]

Jeni Tennison wrote

> Hi Tom,
> You seemed to be saying before that you wanted some way to make the
> schema referenced by the source document provide the types, but your
> example demonstrates why that's a bad idea.
>

Almost - I wanted to have processing be able to proceed in the absence of a
schema even if one had been specified.  But then, as you say, you have to
write the stylesheet defensively.

Cheers,

Tom P