Lists Home |
Date Index |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM" <email@example.com>
Cc: "<sax-devel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Elliotte Rusty Harold
<elharo" <email@example.com>; "<xerces-j-dev"
<firstname.lastname@example.org>; "<xml-dev" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace
> It's been pointed out that my last note was some what garbled, due to an
> editing goof (sorry!) -- let me try again, rephrasing the whole thing:
> Do we have consensus that when namespace processing is turned on, a
> non-qualified element or attribute has the same value for both QName and
> Local Name?
> If so: we've resolved the subject question; move to close debate.
> If not: Could someone indicate where the remaining confusion lies? (I know
> I could benefit from some re-focusing of the question; I suspect that
> help others as well.)
> Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> List: sax-devel, firstname.lastname@example.org
> See: http://www.saxproject.org/