[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 12:40 PM 6/11/2002 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
>
> > I think I'm even less happy about your attribute annotation approach. It
> > makes it look like we actually have a clue, when in fact we rarely
> do. Why
> > not specify a timezone while we're at it? Oh, right, those only appeared
> > around 1850.
>
>Because the gDate datatype covers only dates, not subdivisions thereof.
I think we're stuck between "date" and "gDay" here. I saw the "g" and
those types support timezones.
There's no such thing as a gDate, which is kind of funny, since I might
just want to compare dates with timezones at some point in my career.
Damned with a timezone, damned without.
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
