Lists Home |
Date Index |
> At 01:26 PM 6/11/2002 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> >I agree with John that a type is a named value-space. I also
> >agree with Simon that for type to be useful in XML, its
> >value-space must correspond to a well-defined lexical-space.
> >This is exactly what XML Schema provides.
> Simon St.Laurent:
> It provides it through a very limited set of transformations
> from lexical to value which have their own peculiarities, and
> blesses the value space almost exclusively.
Can you expand on this?
> This is inadequate for those of us who care about lexical
> flexibility, and your supposed agreement is effectively strong
Man, you're so literal ;-) I thought we actually agreed on
something this time.