xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part

Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:44:04 +0000
In-reply-to: <010701c21380$1a771a70$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com>
References: <200206140340.XAA23990@mail.reutershealth.com> <3D09A3D0.9C3F0FAF@setf.de> <010701c21380$1a771a70$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com>

"Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au> wrote:

| But this is discussing techniques before requirements.  

Which is exactly how this namespace bogosity came about.  Are people now
entitled to claim precedent?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
  - From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>

References:
- Re: [dsdl-comment] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
  - From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
- DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Next by Date: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS