[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
[ I dropped dsdl-comment@dsdl.org as apparently its moderated and I'm
not on it]
> which claim, as I noted, is bogus.
It's not particularly useful but I don't see how you can argue with the
spec. If it says that elements are in no namespace unless explictly
declared to be in a namespace then presumably that is the case, by
definition.
(Even if the only sensible way to interpret these things is to treat
them as if they were in a namespace with either no name or name "").
> So what does one call this 'set of names which has the name "", but
> which one can for historical reasons not call a namespace'?
That. (phrases like that appear most weeks on xsl-list in answer to user
questions:-)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
