[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I am not an expert on this, and I have no personal comments. however,
I have heard something very similar to what Simon says --
We need RNG -> WXS converted before people prefer to write schemas in RNG
rather than in WXS.
cheers - murali.
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 02:55 PM 6/21/2002 -0400, Roger L. Costello wrote:
> >John Cowan wrote:
> >
> > > Fear not, James Clark is working on RNG -> WXS.
> >
> >If the goal is to generate an XML Schema ...
>
> From my perspective the goal would be to avoid working with W3C XML Schema
> altogether, and do the design work in RELAX NG. The conversion to WXS
> would be a courtesy to people who use that system, not a goal in itself.
>
> Simon St.Laurent
> "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
|
