[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Ann - I agree, and thanks for correcting me. "Trick" is the wrong
word, I didn't want to imply that it is illegal - just using the full
DTD methodology, as you said. The problem is indeed with
MSXML and has been known for a while.
- Sebastian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ann Navarro
Gesendet: Fr 28.06.2002 15:00
An: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer; MAISONNY Benoit; www-html@w3.org;
xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Cc:
Betreff: Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error
with MSXML
At 02:24 PM 6/28/2002 +0200, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer wrote:
>Perhaps the ongoing work on M12N in XML Schema may
>solve this problem once for all in the future, since the HTML
>WG had to do a lot of tricks with DTDs to make the M12N
>happen in the first place.
They weren't "tricks", though no one is claiming that they
aren't are
complicated DTDs. Heavily parameterized DTDs are legal, and
should (and can
be) parsed appropriately by a robust parser.
The issue is MSXML, issues that have been repeatedly brought to
Microsoft's
attention, and so far are not forthcoming with corrections.
Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
