[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Sebastian Rohde" <Rohde@bluebyte.de>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:52:32 +0300
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcI5YBh1UPF4h21lRPqLckssYjSi4gAAjlxg
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
Yup. Check the link for details.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#AVNormalize
Cheers,
Manos
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Rohde [mailto:Rohde@bluebyte.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:33 PM
> To: Manos Batsis
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
>
>
> Concerning whitespaces - Would it be a problem to have
> carriage returns
> within an attribute?
>
> Sebastian
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Manos Batsis [mailto:m.batsis@bsnet.gr]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2002 15:04
> An: Sebastian Rohde
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Betreff: RE: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
>
>
>
> > From: Sebastian Rohde [mailto:Rohde@bluebyte.de]
>
>
> > > the second one for a variety of reasons (accessibility,
> > > content re-use, stylesheet use, interoperability, etc...).
> > But would it be faster? Or is there no difference in speed?
> > I don't know much about parsers and my greatest requirement
> > is speed(Mostly
> > with the SAX parser).
>
> Although I might agree with Sebastian on data for use in web pages, I
> tent to use attributes whenever possible unless I need control over
> whitespace. This results in smaller filesizes and seems more readable
> (to me at least). I don't thing there is any important difference in
> speed though...
>
> Manos
>
|
